header
header
Free Consultation · Available 24 / 7 (888) 235-6766
06.30.2014

Whistleblowing, Pt. 4: The General Motors Recall

Whistleblowing, Pt. 4: The General Motors Recall

Even the most flagrant instances of corporate fraud or negligence can translate into extremely challenging whistleblower lawsuits. When dealing with corporations as powerful as General Motors, it can sometimes take more than the best efforts of a few individuals to achieve real change.

Courtland Kelley, the head of GM’s nationwide inspection program, sued the company for its failure to address auto safety concerns back in 2003. Courtland was a proud 30-year employee of GM, and both his father and grandfather had worked for the company, so it was especially difficult for him to take legal action against his employer.

After discovering a number of significant safety defects in GM vehicles from fuel leaks to faulty anti-lock brakes, Courtland reported the problems again and again, even threatening to contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration before finally launching a whistleblower lawsuit. But Courtland was no match for GM, and his case was thrown out on procedural grounds.

In 2005, two years after Courtland’s lawsuit, GM employee Laura Andres sent out an email to a number of her colleagues warning of a defective ignition switch in the Chevy Impala. After hitting a bump on the highway her car stalled out, a concern she described as a “serious safety problem.” In her email she went on to say, “I’m thinking big recall.”But there was no big recall. At least not for the next seven years, during which time there have been at least 54 crashes and 13 deaths linked to the ignition switch issue that Laura described. Now, in 2014, over a decade after Courtland Kelley’s failed whistleblower lawsuit against GM, the company is finally acknolwedging the defect in its vehicles with a series of recalls that now total at 20 million.

Consumers are often at the mercy of large corporations like GM, with little real knowledge of the companies’ safety standards. This is why we rely on honest, hard working people like Courtland Kelley to do the right thing even when it’s not in their best interest. Courtland was not able to take down GM on his own, but after enough individuals made noise about the safety problems they saw, they all became a part of the solution. We can only hope that GM will finally learn that it doesn’t pay to cut corners in matters of safety.

Sources: “About GM,” General Motors.Dee-Ann Durbin and Tom Krishner, “GM Could Face Another Fine for Impala Recall,” ABC News, June 19 2014.

Tim Higgins and Nick Summers, “GM Recalls: How General Motors Silenced a Whistle-Blower,” Businessweek, June 18 2014.

Related Practice Areas

Image note: photographs accompanying our blog articles are illustrative and digitally created. They do not depict actual clients, actual attorneys of this firm, or actual events.

Read more

Beyond the App: Unmasking Uber’s Strategy to Evade Passenger Liability
A dark sedan pulled over on a Manhattan avenue at night as a passenger steps out onto the sidewalk.

Beyond the App: Unmasking Uber’s Strategy to Evade Passenger Liability

When a passenger steps into an Uber on the streets of New York, there is an implicit expectation that the multi-billion-dollar ride-hailing giant stands behind the safety of that journey. Yet, in courtrooms and arbitration proceedings across the country, Uber’s primary defense line remains remarkably consistent: we are merely a technology platform, not a transportation […]

When the Safety Net Fails: What Michael Wagner’s Story Teaches NYC Construction Workers About Labor Law 240(1) & Injury Rights
A boom lift beside a steel-framed building under construction in Manhattan, with two workers in hard hats near its base.

When the Safety Net Fails: What Michael Wagner’s Story Teaches NYC Construction Workers About Labor Law 240(1) & Injury Rights

In the immediate aftermath of a severe construction site accident, most injured workers focus on one thing: getting back on their feet. They assume that if they play by the rules, report the incident, and file their claims, the safety net will be there to protect them and their families. Unfortunately, as millions of workers […]

Can New York City Be Liable for a Dangerous Street or Intersection?
A wide Queens boulevard at dusk, with a few pedestrians crossing a long crosswalk as traffic streams past.

Can New York City Be Liable for a Dangerous Street or Intersection?

When a pedestrian, bicyclist or motorist is seriously injured in a New York City traffic accident, the investigation should not always end with the drivers involved. In some cases, the design, operation or maintenance of the roadway itself may have contributed to the crash. New York City has a duty to maintain its streets in […]