header
header
Free Consultation · Available 24 / 7 (888) 235-6766
02.11.2016

Cancer Charities Spend $187 Million on Cruises, Disney World Vacations

Cancer Charities Spend $187 Million on Cruises, Disney World Vacations

Nobody wants to hear that the money they donated to a charitable cause has gone to waste, but that happened on a massive scale last spring when the Federal Trade Commission charged 4 cancer charities with fraud.

The Breast Cancer Society Inc., the Children’s Cancer Fund of America, Inc., Cancer Support Services Inc., and the Cancer Fund of America, Inc. allegedly spent over $187 million on Disney World trips, luxury cruises, concert tickets, and college tuition for board members’ friends and family.

Less than 3% of the money these organizations raised went to cancer patients and research.

“The defendants’ egregious scheme effectively deprived legitimate cancer charities and cancer patients of much-needed funds and support,” said Jessica Rich, the director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.

The TFC proposed a settlement of $135 million between the 4 charities, but they fear that since most of the money has already been spent, there will not be many assets left to recover.

In response to the FTC’s charges, Breast Cancer Society Inc. executive director James Reynolds II has maintained his innocence, blaming a litigious government for the allegations.

“The vast majority of money raised for breast cancer causes are spent to fund research,” Reynolds wrote in a letter on his website. “Charities — including some of the world’s best-known and reputable organizations — are increasingly facing the scrutiny of government regulators in the U.S.”

The possibility that such outrageous behavior may go largely unpunished can be shocking and frustrating to those wishing to donate to a good cause, but charity fraud is more common than you might think.

Many donors might not be able to tell the difference between the Children’s Charity Fund and the Children’s Defense Fund, for instance. However, according to Charity Navigator, a website that evaluates charities, the Children’s Defense Fund is a top tier 4-star rated organization, whereas the Children’s Charity Fund is a 0-star charity that puts only 9.1% of its funds towards charitable programs.

If you are considering a donation to any charity, check out one of the 3 major ratings sites first. CharityWatch, Charity Navigator and the BBB Wise Giving Alliance evaluate organizations’ financial statements, tax forms and other documents in order to help donors select the best charities for any given cause.

To minimize the possibility of wasting your donation on a fraudulent organization, never agree to a donation over the phone, avoid sound-alike names like the Children’s Charity Fund, and always do your research before giving.

Sources: “Criteria and Methodology,” CharityWatch.

Anand, Priya, “Cancer charities accused of spending $187 million in donations on dating sites, trips to Disney,” MarketWatch, 23 May 2015.

“Top 10 Best Practices of Savvy Donors,” Charity Navigator.

Related Practice Areas

Image note: photographs accompanying our blog articles are illustrative and digitally created. They do not depict actual clients, actual attorneys of this firm, or actual events.

Read more

Beyond the App: Unmasking Uber’s Strategy to Evade Passenger Liability
A dark sedan pulled over on a Manhattan avenue at night as a passenger steps out onto the sidewalk.

Beyond the App: Unmasking Uber’s Strategy to Evade Passenger Liability

When a passenger steps into an Uber on the streets of New York, there is an implicit expectation that the multi-billion-dollar ride-hailing giant stands behind the safety of that journey. Yet, in courtrooms and arbitration proceedings across the country, Uber’s primary defense line remains remarkably consistent: we are merely a technology platform, not a transportation […]

When the Safety Net Fails: What Michael Wagner’s Story Teaches NYC Construction Workers About Labor Law 240(1) & Injury Rights
A boom lift beside a steel-framed building under construction in Manhattan, with two workers in hard hats near its base.

When the Safety Net Fails: What Michael Wagner’s Story Teaches NYC Construction Workers About Labor Law 240(1) & Injury Rights

In the immediate aftermath of a severe construction site accident, most injured workers focus on one thing: getting back on their feet. They assume that if they play by the rules, report the incident, and file their claims, the safety net will be there to protect them and their families. Unfortunately, as millions of workers […]

Can New York City Be Liable for a Dangerous Street or Intersection?
A wide Queens boulevard at dusk, with a few pedestrians crossing a long crosswalk as traffic streams past.

Can New York City Be Liable for a Dangerous Street or Intersection?

When a pedestrian, bicyclist or motorist is seriously injured in a New York City traffic accident, the investigation should not always end with the drivers involved. In some cases, the design, operation or maintenance of the roadway itself may have contributed to the crash. New York City has a duty to maintain its streets in […]