header
header
Free Consultation · Available 24 / 7 (888) 235-6766
09.18.2014

Civil Trial Lawyers Take On Terrorism

Civil Trial Lawyers Take On Terrorism

We don’t usually talk about civil lawsuits for their capacity to take on terrorist groups and the institutions that support them, but that’s exactly what has been happening the last week in a US Eastern District court.

In the lawsuit Linde v. Arab Bank, the plaintiffs have claimed that Arab Bank PLC knowingly moved millions of dollars for the Islamist group Hamas to finance acts of violence. Mark S. Werber, a lawyer for American victims and family members in 24 terror attacks in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank from 2001 to 2004, said that Arab Bank knew that they were working for Hamas. “It wasn’t an accident or a mistake or just routine banking,” he said. “It was a choice that Arab Bank made.”

Shand S. Stephens, the bank’s attorney, retorted that Arab Bank relies on terrorist blacklists to screen clients. If an individual or organization does not appear on a blacklist, then the bank has no way of knowing that it might be providing assistance to Hamas.

The first witness called by the defense was 77-year-old billionaire Sabih Al-Masri, the bank’s current chairman. Al-Masri claimed ignorance of his clients’ terrorist affiliations, arguing that terrorism was bad financially for the bank. “Business suffered,” Al-Masri said of the Intifada suicide bombings. ”

Suicide bombers destroyed the opportunity for peace.”Arieh Spitzen, the former chief of the Israeli military’s Department of Palestinian Affairs, served as a witness for the plaintiffs. He testified that between 2000 and 2001, approximately 4 million dollars were transferred through the bank to Hamas leaders in New York. After Spitzen explained that his analysis of Arab Bank’s conduct was incomplete due to the bank’s refusal to hand over its complete records, federal judge Brian Cogan ruled that the jury may infer that Arab Bank provided financial services to Hamas and individuals affiliated with Hamas “knowingly and purposefully.”

This lawsuit marks the first instance of a financial institution put on trial under the civil provisions of the 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act. If the plaintiffs’ case is successful, it will shine light on a new avenue for fighting terrorist organizations and their supporters.

Sources: Keshner, Andrew, “Arab Bank Chairman Takes Stand, Denies Funding Terrorists,” New York Law Journal, September 9, 2014.

Larson, Erik and Christie Smythe, “Arab Bank chairman tells U.S. jury terrorism hurts business,” Chicago Tribune, September 8, 2014.

Marzulli, John, “Billionaire head of Arab Bank denies turning blind eye to funding Hamas, suicide bombers,” New York Daily News, September 8, 2014.

Related Practice Areas

Image note: photographs accompanying our blog articles are illustrative and digitally created. They do not depict actual clients, actual attorneys of this firm, or actual events.

Read more

Beyond the App: Unmasking Uber’s Strategy to Evade Passenger Liability
A dark sedan pulled over on a Manhattan avenue at night as a passenger steps out onto the sidewalk.

Beyond the App: Unmasking Uber’s Strategy to Evade Passenger Liability

When a passenger steps into an Uber on the streets of New York, there is an implicit expectation that the multi-billion-dollar ride-hailing giant stands behind the safety of that journey. Yet, in courtrooms and arbitration proceedings across the country, Uber’s primary defense line remains remarkably consistent: we are merely a technology platform, not a transportation […]

When the Safety Net Fails: What Michael Wagner’s Story Teaches NYC Construction Workers About Labor Law 240(1) & Injury Rights
A boom lift beside a steel-framed building under construction in Manhattan, with two workers in hard hats near its base.

When the Safety Net Fails: What Michael Wagner’s Story Teaches NYC Construction Workers About Labor Law 240(1) & Injury Rights

In the immediate aftermath of a severe construction site accident, most injured workers focus on one thing: getting back on their feet. They assume that if they play by the rules, report the incident, and file their claims, the safety net will be there to protect them and their families. Unfortunately, as millions of workers […]

Can New York City Be Liable for a Dangerous Street or Intersection?
A wide Queens boulevard at dusk, with a few pedestrians crossing a long crosswalk as traffic streams past.

Can New York City Be Liable for a Dangerous Street or Intersection?

When a pedestrian, bicyclist or motorist is seriously injured in a New York City traffic accident, the investigation should not always end with the drivers involved. In some cases, the design, operation or maintenance of the roadway itself may have contributed to the crash. New York City has a duty to maintain its streets in […]